The implications of a Geo-Heliocentric universe

As we come to the closure of the book, the reader might be a bit overwhelmed by all this information. Although it looks simple, it is still a lot to digest. But before we really close off, there is one additional topic I like to address: The implication, if the heliocentric model is wrong and we actually live in a geo-heliocentric model.

Most points mentioned really sound ridicules for someone that didn’t read the previous chapters in this book, since it is in conflict with the core foundation of the current astronomical science, but we have to face the facts. The obliquity, eccentricity, inclination and precession movements are also explained from a geo-heliocentric point of view.

The list might be extended at later point in time, but let’s sum up the most important noticeable implications.

1. The universe is cyclic & stable

   All stars and planets seem to have some sort of local orbit but factual hardly move at all. Binary and triple star systems are common and they are cyclic and stable.

   Consequently the expanding universe and the Big bang don’t exist. The universe is and most probably always will be cyclic & stable.

2. FIBONACCI is also at the core of our solar system

   The golden spiral could already be seen in all of nature, and now as well in our solar system. Besides the dimensional patterns that were already known, the time pattern for the cycles seem to exist as well.

3. The stars are much closer then currently estimated

   Although we do not know how close the stars really are – we need additional research -, we can conclude they are much closer in the geo-heliocentric model then in the heliocentric model.

   The reason being, star-distances are calculated in the assumption the earth moves 300,000,000 km per half a year. If the earth doesn’t move, also the star parallax calculations are wrong meaning the stars are much closer.

4. The age of the visible universe might be wrong

   Since the distance to the stars is much closer, also the age of the visible universe is much younger. The calculated 13 billion year is wrong.

   Alternatively, it might also mean we cannot see beyond a certain point in space. Just like a flash light losing energy, also the light as spread by stars are losing energy.

   This might also explains the visible red shift: the further and dimmer the stars, the redder the shift. Beyond a certain point nothing can be seen anymore.

5. The gravity force needs to be recalculated

   all mass-estimates of distant celestial bodies have been based, to this day, upon Einstein’s and Newton’s theories of gravity.

   Since gravity laws already couldn’t explain the movements outside our galaxy, and now also within our galaxy, we need to take another look at the gravity force again. And to be complete: I believe there is some underlying force, since we are rotating on our axis without falling from Earth.

6. Einstein’s theory of relativity needs to be re-examined

   The theory of special and general relativity is mainly proven by the mismatch to the observed position of Mercury perihelion compared to the calculated position. This could also be well explained by the fact we are slowly moving on our Earth Axial Precession Orbit (EAPO).

   Additionally since the Earth is hardly moving, the famous Michaelson Morley experiment can be relooked at again. Einstein’s theory is shaking at his foundation.

   

7. The revised Milankovitch cycles can be explored

   The widely accepted Milankovitch cycles are based upon inclinations of 22.1 to 24.5 degrees. The model as described here can vary between 20.8 to 25.8 degrees.

   It can most probably explain the 100k year problem which is currently missing as explanation.

   The implications can also be taken into account into the Human vs Natural caused climate change discussions.

Just as I started this book I will also close it the same way: I am just an outsider in the field of astronomy and therefore might have made some mistakes in this book which can be refuted. My real goal is to have a discussion about the true structure of our universe and to steer it in the proper direction.

In my view the current heliocentric model is not comprehensible and according to what our eyes and ears observe. I love to see the smart people / real scientists take up the challenge to have a closer look and either bring this model down based upon scientific facts or take this new model further.